“This is not a problem for conservatives. This is a problem for humanity. Who gave a handful of executives in Silicon Valley the right to decide what billions of people around the world can see and cannot see?” -Robert Epstein
Wow, Report Just Out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought! @JudicialWatch
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 19, 2019
Reported Earlier by Tyler O’Neil | PJ Media
On Monday, President Donald Trump shared the results of a study showing that Hillary Clinton’s margin of victory in the popular vote in the 2016 election could be explained by Google bias. The study’s author, Ph.D. psychologist Robert Epstein, was himself a Clinton supporter in 2016, but he is concerned about Google’s power to manipulate elections.
Trump’s tweet likely referred to a 2017 white paper published by the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology (AIBRT) suggesting that Clinton’s popular vote margin was almost entirely attributable to pro-Clinton bias at Google.
“Extrapolating from the mathematics introduced in this report… the lead author of the PNAS study [Epstein himself] predicted that a pro-Clinton bias in Google’s search results would, over time, shift at least 2.6 million votes to Clinton. She won the popular vote in the November election by 2,864,974 votes,” Epstein wrote with his co-author Ronald E. Robertson.
“Without the pro-Clinton bias in Google’s search results, her win margin in the popular vote would have been negligible,” Epstein wrote.
Trump is correct to infer from this that his “victory was even bigger than thought.” If the study is correct, it is a near miracle that the president prevailed over Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Must Watch Video:
Read More/Source: PJ Media
Cover Photo Credit: AP Photo/J Pat Carter